Glossary • Buyer guides • Templates • Library

Resources

Practical materials to help you understand, evaluate, and run synthetic market research: definitions, checklists, templates, and an annotated reading library.

How to use this page
New to the category? Start with the glossary. Buying a tool? Jump to the buyer guide and vendor checklist. Running studies? Use the disclosure label and protocol templates.
Quick navigation
On this page
Glossary (starter set)
Clear definitions designed to reduce category confusion.
View full glossary
Synthetic market research
Research workflows (surveys, concept tests, message tests, scenario simulation) run using statistically grounded synthetic panels. Best treated as an accelerated way to generate and test hypotheses, then validate with benchmarks and, where appropriate, targeted fieldwork.
definition validation disclosure
Synthetic personas
Simulated individuals with attributes and constraints (demographics, behaviours, preferences) designed to represent segments of a target population. Credible systems are explicit about what grounds the persona and what is inferred.
panels grounding limitations
Digital twins (in research)
A stricter term often implying higher-fidelity, more stable, and more carefully grounded representations that can be tested repeatedly. In practice, the label varies - so buyers should ask for validation and disclosure, not terminology.
stability reporting
Synthetic respondents / synthetic samples
Synthetic “participants” used to answer survey-style questions. The key risk is confusing plausible outputs for measured reality. Require population framing, repeatability, and external benchmarks.
surveys safeguards
Want the full taxonomy?
The full glossary includes comparisons (synthetic data vs synthetic research, personas vs digital twins), plus definitions optimised for consistent procurement language.
Buyer guide
A practical path for evaluating tools, agencies, and vendors.
Vendor checklist
Vendor evaluation checklist
Procurement-ready questions for demos and pilots
Focus on population framing, grounding, validation, disclosure, auditability, and limitations.
Pilot plan (2 weeks)
A simple way to test stability and usefulness
Run two repeatable study types, compare runs, and benchmark against a small real sample where feasible.
RFP questions
A starting point for a formal vendor process
Standard wording that makes responses comparable across vendors.
Templates
Ready-to-use documents for consistent studies and disclosure.
Disclosure label
Study disclosure label
A “nutrition label” that makes studies comparable: population frame, panel design, grounding, validation, limitations, privacy posture, and reproducibility.
Protocol checklist
A one-page checklist for repeatable studies: fixed stimuli, fixed wording, run settings, test-retest runs, sensitivity tests, and reporting norms.
Benchmark pack (starter)
A small suite of tests: stability, sensitivity, known-truth tasks, external benchmark comparisons, segment consistency, and knowledge boundary checks.
Study report template
A report structure that forces clarity: population frame, method, validation results, findings, limitations, and recommended next steps.