Why this topic matters
“Persona” can mean a prompt, a structured profile, or a calibrated simulation with memory and state. Without shared definitions and disclosures, buyers cannot tell which they are getting and governance teams cannot set the right guardrails.
- Demand persona specifications: grounding, memory, state, and connectivity.
- Use declared capability levels to make vendors and tools comparable.
- Document limits so teams treat personas as simulation unless validated as decision-grade.
Use this page to
- Align teams on what “persona” means in your stack.
- Borrow language for procurement and disclosure labels.
- Pick tools based on scenario, not hype.
Tip: pair persona taxonomy work with validation runs so claims stay testable.
Articles tagged Personas
Posts that unpack persona definitions, governance expectations, and tool choices.
Personas • Buyer guide
A practical walkthrough of Gate 0, structured demos, pilots, validation, and scoring using the SMRA vendor checklist.
Personas • Principles
How OECD AI Principles translate into controls for synthetic personas, twins, and simulated panels.
Personas • Ethics
A call for persona taxonomy, capability disclosure, and ethics guardrails so buyers know what they are purchasing.
Personas • Tools
Scenario-based recommendations for content optimization, consumer personas, managed outputs, and high-stakes strategy.